"The quality of research they have done for us has been excellent."
Brian Moore, VP, NICCA USA, Inc.
testimonials
MoreToddler milk for sale at a Bangkok grocery store. Toddler milk is exempt from advertising restrictions in Thailand after more than a year of lobbying by U.S. trade officials and the formula industry.
ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power. Sign up to receive our biggest stories as soon as theyre published.
If youre a parent, you might have noticed toddler milk while browsing the formula aisle. The powdered drink, aimed at children between 1 and 3, often pledges benefits like improved brain development or improved immune function.
But you may not know that these products are largely unregulated and make claims that are not supported by science, according to studies. For this reason, among others, public health authorities around the world have long sought to police such advertising. Yet despite these efforts, toddler milk has grown to become a $20 billion global business.
ProPublica
Defend the facts. Support independent journalism by donating to ProPublica.
Donate NowAs ProPublica reported recently, the U.S. government has played a key role in that growth.
We found federal officials have worked for decades with the multibillion-dollar baby formula industry to mount a global campaign to suppress regulations such as marketing bans often, critics say, at the expense of public health, particularly in developing countries.
Toddler milk, it turns out, is just the latest chapter in this long-running saga.
Below is a list of key questions and answers about baby formula companies business overseas and how the U.S. government has supported those corporate interests.
According to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, infant formula is a special food suitable to serve as a complete or partial substitute for breastmilk. Its used for babies under age 1.
Formula is one of only two products in the world for which there are international recommendations that countries prohibit their marketing. The other is tobacco.
People in the U.S. today may find that shocking, since formula is a regular part of life for many parents. But more than four decades ago, concerns about unregulated advertising of formula surfaced after health advocates found that companies such as Nestle had targeted developing nations in places like Africa in hopes of increasing formula sales. Thousands of babies were growing ill and dying because these populations had neither the clean water they needed to mix the formula safely nor the resources to buy enough of the expensive product.
In response, the World Health Organizations member nations established an international code advising countries to prohibit the marketing of infant formula.
The WHO and UNICEF recommend that babies breastfeed exclusively for six months and continue through their second birthday and beyond as other foods are introduced. The benefits are well-documented. Studies have found fewer infant deaths and infections among breastfed children and fewer incidences of long-term conditions like diabetes and obesity.
The formula industry acknowledges the benefits. Breast milk offers a child the best nutritional start in life, a spokesperson for formula maker Danone said. But if parents cannot or choose not to breastfeed their baby, formulas are recognized by leading medical societies as the only safe and nutritionally adequate alternative during a babys first year.
Public health advocates, however, worry that the industrys aggressive advertising which often includes steep discounts and free samples will derail a critical cycle for those who intend to breastfeed. Regularly giving your baby formula can cause your breast milk supply to drop, research shows, making your child more reliant on formula.
The evidence is strong, a report from the WHO and UNICEF explains. Formula milk marketing, not the product itself, disrupts informed decision-making and undermines breastfeeding and child health.
Toddler milk is sold with a promotional musical play set at a Bangkok grocery store.
Credit:
June Watsamon Tri-yasakda, special to ProPublicaSo-called toddler formula, also known as growing-up milk, typically targets children between the ages of 1 and 3 a time when many parents begin giving their children cows milk and more regular foods. Toddler milk often contains nutritional supplements like DHA, an omega-3 fatty acid, and promises benefits for brain and eye health. In Thailand, we even found a brand called Hi-Q1.
For more information, please visit HEORSHE.
Health authorities, however, say these claims are dubious. In fact, last fall, the American Academy of Pediatrics warned that toddler milks are misleadingly promoted as a necessary part of a healthy childs diet. The drinks are worse than infant formula for babies under 1 year and do not offer any benefits over cheaper cows milk for most children older than 1, according to Dr. George Fuchs III, a lead author of the organizations report.
Nutrition experts also caution about the hefty doses of sweeteners and sodium in some brands.
The industry defends toddler drinks. They can contribute to nutritional intake and potentially fill nutrition gaps for children 12 months and older, according to the Infant Nutrition Council of America, a formula industry trade group.
Unlike baby formula, which must meet certain nutritional requirements, toddler formula is not regulated by the Food and Drug Administration in the U.S.
Our reporting examined the industrys interactions with a number of federal agencies. A key one was the Office of the United States Trade Representative, which advises the president on trade policy and seeks to promote American business interests. Records show that USTR staff were in regular contact with formula makers and their industry groups through meetings, calls and position papers. Trade officials then mirrored those positions in communications with other countries or in international forums like the World Trade Organization, documents show.
In many places, the U.S. efforts appeared to succeed. Hong Kong, Indonesia and Thailand, among others, watered down or put on hold regulations aimed at restricting formula advertising after U.S. objections.
The U.S. Has Waged a Global Campaign Against Formula Regulation
U.S. agencies have intervened in at least 17 jurisdictions over the last several decades on behalf of the formula industry, often to oppose measures that would restrict formula marketing or require additional safety precautions.
Source: ProPublica review of academic research , World Trade Organization records, letters and other U.S. government documents, WikiLeaks cables and news accounts.
Credit:
Lucas Waldron/ProPublicaThe U.S. is a significant exporter of formula, and the industry has spent considerable resources to protect its financial interests abroad. Its lobbying activity related to foreign health policy ramped up beginning in , as World Health Organization nations considered a resolution aimed at ending the promotion of toddler formula.
That year, the Infant Nutrition Council of America lobbied the USTR and at least four other departments, as well as the Senate and the House, regarding the WHO effort. Leaders in both parties took notice. House Speaker Paul Ryan even called President Barack Obama about the issue, according to records obtained by ProPublica.
Trade officials concerns have often reflected those of the industry itself. In one case, they said in a draft letter that proposed rules would result in significant commercial loss for U.S. companies. In another case, they worried that a marketing proposal would have a regulatory spillover effect in Southeast Asia, one of the industrys top markets.
The USTR declined to comment on specific cases but said more generally that, under President Joe Biden, the trade office has emphasized respecting the role of foreign governments in deciding the appropriate regulatory approach to infant formula.
In , WHO member nations adopted the International Code of Marketing of Breast-Milk Substitutes, which aimed to curb the worldwide promotion of products that could replace breast milk. The U.S. was the only nation to oppose it.
Since then, at least 144 countries have sought to codify the voluntary restrictions. Such laws often restrict formula marketing in stores, hospitals and elsewhere. Despite poor enforcement in many countries, the laws have had measurable benefits. Countries that have adopted marketing bans have seen their breastfeeding rates rise, studies show, and more breastfeeding is in turn linked to lower infant mortality. It also reduces mothers risk of certain cancers.
Developing economies represent big business for the formula industry. One academic study found that low- and middle-income countries accounted for more than 90% of the roughly $19 billion in toddler milk sales in .
As incomes have risen in those countries, formula makers saw an opportunity. In most countries, breastfeeding is incompatible with women participating fully in the workforce, Kasper Jakobsen, CEO of the formula company Mead Johnson, said in a earnings call. As women participate in the workforce, that creates a rapid increase in the number of dual-income families that can afford more expensive, premium nutrition products.
Today, Southeast Asia is more important to the formula industry than the U.S. and European markets combined.
Infant Formula Looks Nearly Identical to Toddler Milk on a Grocery Stores Shelves in Bangkok
Thailand's Milk Code restricts the advertisement of infant formula, but marketing of toddler milk is generally allowed.
Formula marketing can impact a countrys breastfeeding rates and, in turn, its childrens health, since breastfeeding carries benefits such as fewer infant deaths and infections.
Thai officials made a similar argument when they sought to restrict the promotion of infant and toddler formula in . They blamed such advertising, in part, for the nations breastfeeding rate, which was among the lowest in the world. Some Thai pediatric authorities also say formula products play a big role in the countrys rising obesity rates because theyre so easy to drink.
The share of Thailands babies who are exclusively breastfed for six months has rebounded somewhat but has a long way to go to meet the WHOs target of 50% by .
Other dairy and formula-producing countries also promote their products abroad and, at the World Trade Organization, countries such as Australia and New Zealand sometimes join the U.S. in objecting to formula regulations. But the U.S. brings outsized economic and political clout to the debate. The U.S. is highly influential, said Dr. Robert Boyle, of the Imperial College London, who has researched international formula use.
According to the USTR website, part of the offices job is to work for the expansion of market access for American goods and services.
In formulating its official positions on issues, the USTR says it consults with various federal agencies, including those focused on health. But our reporting shows that these debates can be contentious, with trade concerns often trumping public health. In , for example, USTR officials repeatedly questioned well-established science as they sought to water down a WHO resolution that aimed to restrict formula marketing and increase breastfeeding.
The USTR declined to comment on this incident, but it issued a statement acknowledging the offices formerly standard view that too often deemed legitimate regulatory initiatives as trade barriers.
Its unclear. A USTR spokesperson told us that under Biden, the trade office has been committed to making sure our trade policy works for people not blindly advancing the will of corporations.
But our investigation found several examples of the trade office under Biden handling formula regulation like it did in past administrations. The USTR did not respond to our questions about these cases.
If you are looking for more details, kindly visit baby product manufacturers.